i5-11400F vs Xeon E5-4669 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 135 Watt
7.25
Core i5-11400F
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.71
+47.7%

Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-4669 v4 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking980722
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3037.62
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency5.0815.59
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007$157

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-11400F has 12440% better value for money than Xeon E5-4669 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads4412
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache55 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 7.25
i5-11400F 10.71
+47.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 11523
i5-11400F 17011
+47.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.25 10.71
Recency 20 June 2016 16 March 2021
Physical cores 22 6
Threads 44 12
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 266.7% more physical cores and 266.7% more threads.

i5-11400F, on the other hand, has a 47.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 107.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-11400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4669 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4669 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-11400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4669 v4
Xeon E5-4669 v4
Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4669 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8717 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4669 v4 or Core i5-11400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.