Athlon 3000G vs Xeon E5-4669 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 135 Watt
7.47
+157%

Xeon E5-4669 v4 outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9601645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.315.27
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 3000G has 1600% better value for money than Xeon E5-4669 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads444
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIPCIe 3.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2235
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache55 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB?
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes406

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 7.47
+157%
Athlon 3000G 2.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 11523
+157%
Athlon 3000G 4484

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.47 2.91
Recency 20 June 2016 21 November 2019
Physical cores 22 2
Threads 44 4
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-4669 v4 has a 156.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 1000% more physical cores and 1000% more threads.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 285.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4669 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4669 v4
Xeon E5-4669 v4
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4669 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2039 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4669 v4 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.