Opteron 6278 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4669 v3
2015
18 cores / 36 threads, 135 Watt
11.39
+27%

Xeon E5-4669 v3 outperforms Opteron 6278 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking705866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.697.11
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2316 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)88 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration44
SocketFCLGA2011G34
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4669 v3 11.39
+27%
Opteron 6278 8.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4669 v3 17430
+26.9%
Opteron 6278 13733

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.39 8.97
Recency 1 June 2015 1 May 2012
Physical cores 18 16
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon E5-4669 v3 has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 12.5% more physical cores and 125% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 6278, on the other hand, has 17.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4669 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6278 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4669 v3 and Opteron 6278, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3
Xeon E5-4669 v3
AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4669 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 12 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4669 v3 or Opteron 6278, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.