Xeon E3-1285 v3 vs E5-4640

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4640
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.41
+0.5%
Xeon E3-1285 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 84 Watt
4.39

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13421351
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.29no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.394.95
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)2 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,730no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size435 mm2160 mm2
Number of transistors2,270 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD P4600
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4640 4.41
+0.5%
Xeon E3-1285 v3 4.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4640 7012
+0.5%
Xeon E3-1285 v3 6974

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.41 4.39
Recency 14 May 2012 2 June 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 84 Watt

Xeon E5-4640 has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon E3-1285 v3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 13.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4640 and Xeon E3-1285 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4640
Xeon E5-4640
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3
Xeon E3-1285 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4640 or Xeon E3-1285 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.