Processor 300 vs Xeon E5-4627 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4627 v4
2016
10 cores / 10 threads, 135 Watt
8.16
+80.9%
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51

Xeon E5-4627 v4 outperforms Processor 300 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9311320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.25no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency5.729.28
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,225$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads104
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA20111700
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 8.16
+80.9%
Processor 300 4.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 12969
+81.1%
Processor 300 7160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.16 4.51
Recency 20 June 2016 8 January 2024
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 10 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 46 Watt

Xeon E5-4627 v4 has a 80.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 193.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4627 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4627 v4
Xeon E5-4627 v4
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4627 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4627 v4 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.