Athlon 200GE vs Xeon E5-4620 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
6.88
+156%

Xeon E5-4620 v3 outperforms Athlon 200GE by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10261718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.27
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency5.977.01
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)6 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads204
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4620 v3 6.88
+156%
Athlon 200GE 2.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4620 v3 10525
+156%
Athlon 200GE 4114

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.88 2.69
Recency 1 June 2015 6 September 2018
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-4620 v3 has a 155.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

Athlon 200GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4620 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 200GE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4620 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 200GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Athlon 200GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3
Xeon E5-4620 v3
AMD Athlon 200GE
Athlon 200GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 762 votes

Rate Athlon 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4620 v3 or Athlon 200GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.