Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs E5-4620 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4620 v2
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
6.22
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
30.27
+387%

Platinum 8368Q outperforms E5-4620 v2 by a whopping 387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1068141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)38
Threads1676
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB Intel® Smart Cache57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4620 v2 6.22
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 30.27
+387%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4620 v2 9590
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+387%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.22 30.27
Recency 1 January 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 38
Threads 16 76
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon E5-4620 v2 has 184.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q, on the other hand, has a 386.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 375% more physical cores and 375% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4620 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4620 v2
Xeon E5-4620 v2
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4620 v2 or Xeon Platinum 8368Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.