Xeon E5-2673 V3 vs E5-4620 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4620 v2
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
6.27
Xeon E5-2673 V3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
9.31
+48.5%

Xeon E5-2673 V3 outperforms Xeon E5-4620 v2 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1086852
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.028.09
Architecture codenameno dataHaswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB Intel® Smart Cache30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketFCLGA20112011-3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4620 v2 6.27
Xeon E5-2673 V3 9.31
+48.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4620 v2 9590
Xeon E5-2673 V3 14243
+48.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.27 9.31
Recency 1 January 2014 8 September 2014
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon E5-4620 v2 has 10.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2673 V3, on the other hand, has a 48.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Xeon E5-2673 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4620 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4620 v2
Xeon E5-4620 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2673 V3
Xeon E5-2673 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 299 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2673 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4620 v2 or Xeon E5-2673 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.