Core i7-13700K vs Xeon E5-2699A v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.16
Core i7-13700K
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
30.09
+86.2%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking378131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.7164.90
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raptor Lake-S
Release date25 October 2016 (7 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,938$409
Current price$513 (0.1x MSRP)$474 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700K has 288% better value for money than Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4424
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size456.12 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPPno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.6 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.16
i7-13700K 30.09
+86.2%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 86% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 25000
i7-13700K 46549
+86.2%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 86% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 1191
i7-13700K 2841
+139%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 139% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 9637
i7-13700K 17641
+83.1%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 83% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.16 30.09
Recency 25 October 2016 27 September 2022
Physical cores 22 16
Threads 44 24
Cost $4938 $409
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 125 Watt

The Core i7-13700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2699A v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-13700K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Core i7-13700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Intel Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 37 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1153 votes

Rate Core i7-13700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699A v4 or Core i7-13700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.