EPYC 9654P vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.45
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
73.67
+348%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon E5-2699 v4 by a whopping 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.306.98
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Genoa
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,115$10,625
Current price$434 (0.1x MSRP)$5987 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 148% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)96
Threads44192
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size456.12 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011SP5
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1.5 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 16.45
EPYC 9654P 73.67
+348%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon E5-2699 v4 by 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2699 v4 25437
EPYC 9654P 113949
+348%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon E5-2699 v4 by 348% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.45 73.67
Recency 20 June 2016 10 November 2022
Physical cores 22 96
Threads 44 192
Cost $4115 $10625
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2699 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 447 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v4 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.