Celeron U3600 vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking428not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.56no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency10.24no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)11 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,115no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads442
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 1.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier229
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache5.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache55 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C105 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3-800
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s12.799 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 24916
+4203%
Celeron U3600 579

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 11 January 2011
Physical cores 22 2
Threads 44 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v4 has an age advantage of 5 years, 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron U3600, on the other hand, has 705.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron U3600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 498 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v4 or Celeron U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.