Atom C3955 vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.45
+339%

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Atom C3955 by a whopping 339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3711400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.460.76
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Atom
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,115$434
Current price$429 (0.1x MSRP)$850 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 2197% better value for money than Atom C3955.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data896 KB
L2 cache5.5 MB16 MB
L3 cache55 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature79 °C78 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size1.5 TB256 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanes4016
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 16.45
+339%
Atom C3955 3.75

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Atom C3955 by 339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2699 v4 25437
+338%
Atom C3955 5803

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Atom C3955 by 338% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.45 3.75
Recency 20 June 2016 15 August 2017
Physical cores 22 16
Threads 44 16
Cost $4115 $434
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 32 Watt

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3955 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom C3955, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
Intel Atom C3955
Atom C3955

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 447 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v4 or Atom C3955, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.