i3-2310E vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
12.83
+1006%
Core i3-2310E
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.16

Xeon E5-2699 v3 outperforms Core i3-2310E by a whopping 1006% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5922367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency8.373.14
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads364
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate9.6 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2149 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 12.83
+1006%
i3-2310E 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20387
+1005%
i3-2310E 1845

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.83 1.16
Recency 8 September 2014 1 February 2011
Physical cores 18 2
Threads 36 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v3 has a 1006% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 800% more physical cores and 800% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

i3-2310E, on the other hand, has 314.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2310E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-2310E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Core i3-2310E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
Intel Core i3-2310E
Core i3-2310E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 891 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Core i3-2310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v3 or Core i3-2310E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.