Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Xeon E5-2698A V3
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 537 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | no data |
| Release date | 18 November 2014 (10 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 7.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 40 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 88 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,600 million | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 2011-3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 2424 ‑ 3696 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 November 2014 | 17 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 10 |
| Threads | 32 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 2424 Watt |
Xeon E5-2698A V3 has 60% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and 1369.1% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2698A V3 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2698A V3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
