FX-6200 vs Xeon E5-2697A v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 145 Watt
13.62
+432%
FX-6200
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.56

Xeon E5-2697A v4 outperforms FX-6200 by a whopping 432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5491746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.71no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.891.94
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,891no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads326
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cacheno data288 KB
L2 cache4 MB6144 KB
L3 cache40 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C61 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 13.62
+432%
FX-6200 2.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 21633
+431%
FX-6200 4071

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 1070
+162%
FX-6200 409

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 8285
+538%
FX-6200 1299

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.62 2.56
Recency 20 June 2016 27 February 2012
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2697A v4 has a 432% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX-6200, on the other hand, has 16% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697A v4 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
AMD FX-6200
FX-6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 271 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2697A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 135 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697A v4 or FX-6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.