EPYC 4564P vs Xeon E5-2697A v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 145 Watt
13.58
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.07
+188%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Xeon E5-2697A v4 by a whopping 188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking54472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6653.48
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.8621.75
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,891$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4564P has 1911% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697A v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache40 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size456.12 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011AM5
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4028

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 13.58
EPYC 4564P 39.07
+188%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 21579
EPYC 4564P 62061
+188%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.58 39.07
Recency 20 June 2016 21 May 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 17.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 187.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697A v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 257 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697A v4 or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.