Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon E5-2697A v4
Aggregate performance score
i9-11900KB outperforms Xeon E5-2697A v4 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 518 | 470 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.65 | 18.04 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
Architecture codename | Broadwell (2014−2019) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 14 June 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,891 | $539 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i9-11900KB has 171% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697A v4.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 16 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
Bus type | QPI | no data |
Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 26 | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 768 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 10 MB |
L3 cache | 40 MB | 24 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 456.12 mm2 | 190 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 7200 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | no data | BGA 1499 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 145 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 40 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 13.90 | 14.80 |
Recency | 20 June 2016 | 14 June 2021 |
Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
Threads | 32 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 145 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
i9-11900KB, on the other hand, has a 6.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 123.1% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2697A v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-11900KB is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Core i9-11900KB, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.