Xeon Gold 6138T vs E5-2697 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.15
+1.2%
Xeon Gold 6138T
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
13.00

Xeon E5-2697 v4 outperforms Xeon Gold 6138T by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking567574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.663.25
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency8.589.84
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,702$2,742

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6138T has 22% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads3640
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2320
L1 cacheno data1.25 MB
L2 cache4.5 MB20 MB
L3 cache45 MB27.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature79 °C94 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1.5 TB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 13.15
+1.2%
Xeon Gold 6138T 13.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 20887
+1.2%
Xeon Gold 6138T 20649

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.15 13.00
Recency 20 June 2016 25 April 2017
Physical cores 18 20
Threads 36 40
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v4 has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Gold 6138T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, 11.1% more physical cores and 11.1% more threads, and 16% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon Gold 6138T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Xeon E5-2697 v4
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
Xeon Gold 6138T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 217 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6138T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v4 or Xeon Gold 6138T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.