Ryzen 3 3200U vs Xeon E5-2697 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	567	1777
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.66	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	Intel Xeon E5	AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency	8.58	15.02
Architecture codename	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,702	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	18 (Octadeca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	36	4
Base clock speed	2.3 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.5 GHz
Bus type	QPI	PCIe 3.0
Bus rate	2 × 9.6 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	23	26
L1 cache	no data	128K (per core)
L2 cache	4.5 MB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	45 MB	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Die size	456.12 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	79 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	7200 Million	4940 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA2011	FP5
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400	DDR4
Maximum memory size	1.5 TB	64 GB
Max memory channels	4	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	40	12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	13.15	2.38
Recency	20 June 2016	6 January 2019
Physical cores	18	2
Threads	36	4
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---