Xeon W3680 vs E5-2697 v3

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	577	1225
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	34.12	2.37
Market segment	Server	Server
Architecture codename	Haswell-EP (2014)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
Release date	8 September 2014 (9 years ago)	16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$350
Current price	$79	$213 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 1340% better value for money than Xeon W3680.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	14 (Tetradeca-Core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	28	12
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.6 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	35 MB (shared)	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Die size	356 mm2	239 mm2
Maximum core temperature	77 °C	68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	77 °C	no data
Number of transistors	5,560 million	1,170 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	no data
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	-	no data
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	+
PAE	46 Bit	36 Bit
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	-	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133	DDR3
Maximum memory size	768 GB	24 GB
Max memory channels	4	3
Maximum memory bandwidth	68 GB/s	32 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E5-2697 v3 outperforms W3680 by 167% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Performance score	12.10	4.53
Recency	8 September 2014	16 March 2010
Physical cores	14	6
Threads	28	12
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	130 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W3680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---