Xeon W-2104 vs E5-2697 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 145 Watt
11.62
+236%
Xeon W-2104
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
3.46

Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms Xeon W-2104 by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6761554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.00
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency7.582.73
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)29 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$255

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)8.25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2484 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °C66 °C
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size768 GB512 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 11.62
+236%
Xeon W-2104 3.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18453
+236%
Xeon W-2104 5495

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.62 3.46
Recency 8 September 2014 29 August 2017
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has a 235.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

Xeon W-2104, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 20.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2104 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-2104, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Xeon W-2104
Xeon W-2104

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 689 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-2104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or Xeon W-2104, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.