Xeon Platinum 8461V vs E5-2697 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 145 Watt
11.70
Xeon Platinum 8461V
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 300 Watt
47.20
+303%

Xeon Platinum 8461V outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking66041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.07
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.6414.89
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,491

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads2896
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)97.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size356 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °C77 °C
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 11.70
Xeon Platinum 8461V 47.20
+303%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18577
Xeon Platinum 8461V 74982
+304%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.70 47.20
Recency 8 September 2014 10 January 2023
Physical cores 14 48
Threads 28 96
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 300 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 106.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8461V, on the other hand, has a 303.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 242.9% more physical cores and 242.9% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8461V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Xeon Platinum 8461V
Xeon Platinum 8461V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 673 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8461V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or Xeon Platinum 8461V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.