Xeon Platinum 8260M vs E5-2697 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 145 Watt
10.32
Xeon Platinum 8260M
2018, $7,705
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
19.27
+86.7%

Xeon Platinum 8260M outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking865356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.06
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency7.6312.52
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Release date8 September 2014 (11 years ago)11 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,705

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2848
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)35.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration28 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 10.32
Xeon Platinum 8260M 19.27
+86.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18185
Samples: 624
Xeon Platinum 8260M 33970
+86.8%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.32 19.27
Recency 8 September 2014 11 December 2018
Physical cores 14 24
Threads 28 48
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 13.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8260M, on the other hand, has a 86.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Xeon Platinum 8260M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 891 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8260M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.