Celeron G6900E vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking676not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.58no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA20111700
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 1092
Celeron G6900E 1561
+42.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 7429
+175%
Celeron G6900E 2702

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2014 4 January 2022
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 46 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 215.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 688 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.