Xeon w9-3475X vs E5-2697 v2

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	831	60
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.96	26.91
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon (Desktop)	no data
Power efficiency	6.54	12.92
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date	1 September 2013 (11 years ago)	15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,723	$3,739

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3475X has 1273% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	36
Threads	24	72
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	4.8 GHz
Bus rate	8GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	30 MB (shared)	82.5 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	160 mm2	4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature	86 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
Number of transistors	1,400 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
Status	Discontinued	Launched
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	768 GB	4 TB
Max memory channels	4	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	59.7 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	40	112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	9.34	42.59
Recency	1 September 2013	15 February 2023
Physical cores	12	36
Threads	24	72
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	300 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---