FX-8370E vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 130 Watt
9.25
+169%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms FX-8370E by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8281541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.34no data
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate8GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache3 MB8192 KB
L3 cache30 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 9.25
+169%
FX-8370E 3.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 14259
+169%
FX-8370E 5306

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.25 3.44
Recency 10 September 2013 2 September 2014
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v2 has a 168.9% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX-8370E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8370E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and FX-8370E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
AMD FX-8370E
FX-8370E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 739 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 87 votes

Rate FX-8370E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or FX-8370E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.