Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking778not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.85no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Intel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)20 August 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$284
Current price$96 (0.1x MSRP)$124 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus support8GT/s1066 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V - 1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-no data
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 14311
+1786%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 759

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 1786% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 4173
+94.6%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 2144

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 95% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 34776
+803%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 3850

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 803% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 8843
+580%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1300

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 580% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 12.31
+250%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 43.12

Core 2 Duo SL9400 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 250% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 18
+1486%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 1486% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 20 August 2008
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Cost $1723 $284
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core 2 Duo SL9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
Core 2 Duo SL9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 701 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or Core 2 Duo SL9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.