Xeon Gold 5318H vs E5-2696 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 150 Watt
15.65
Xeon Gold 5318H
2021
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
18.45
+17.9%

Xeon Gold 5318H outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v4 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking439325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency9.8811.65
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads4436
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)4
Socketno dataFCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory size1,536 GB1.12 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 15.65
Xeon Gold 5318H 18.45
+17.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 24862
Xeon Gold 5318H 29301
+17.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.65 18.45
Recency 20 June 2016 6 April 2021
Physical cores 22 18
Threads 44 36

Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 22.2% more physical cores and 22.2% more threads.

Xeon Gold 5318H, on the other hand, has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Xeon Gold 5318H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2696 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
Xeon E5-2696 v4
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
Xeon Gold 5318H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 365 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 v4 or Xeon Gold 5318H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.