Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Xeon E5-2696 v4
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2696 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 560 | 1219 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 4.01 | 17.76 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 19 April 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 22 (Docosa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 44 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 5.5 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 55 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 456.12 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 7200 Million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.17 | 6.27 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 19 April 2022 |
| Physical cores | 22 | 4 |
| Threads | 44 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon E5-2696 v4 has a 126% higher aggregate performance score, and 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2696 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
