i5-7640K vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking582not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency10.07no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Kaby Lake-X (2017)
Release date20 June 2016 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44no data
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB6144 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno data1151
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt112 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 22 4
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 112 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 450% more physical cores.

i5-7640K, on the other hand, has 33.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Intel Core i5-7640K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2696 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-7640K is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
Xeon E5-2696 v4
Intel Core i5-7640K
Core i5-7640K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 463 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate Core i5-7640K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Core i5-7640K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.