Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs E5-2696 V3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads
14.42
+18.8%
Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads
12.14

E5-2696 V3 outperforms E5-2682 v4 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking454572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation45.6117.26
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)20 June 2016 (7 years ago)
Current price$122 $248

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has 164% better value for money than Xeon E5-2682 v4.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3632
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus supportno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)40 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
Socket2011-3no data
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR42133 MHz Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory sizeno data1,536 GB

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 14.42
+18.8%
Xeon E5-2682 v4 12.14

E5-2696 V3 outperforms E5-2682 v4 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2696 V3 22309
+18.8%
Xeon E5-2682 v4 18781

E5-2696 V3 outperforms E5-2682 v4 by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 14.42 12.14
Recency 8 September 2014 20 June 2016
Physical cores 18 16
Threads 36 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 120 Watt

The Xeon E5-2696 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2682 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2682 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1065 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 107 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or Xeon E5-2682 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.