Xeon E5-2696 V3 vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+211%
Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads
14.46

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 211% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking39447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.0245.67
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Haswell-EP (2014)
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years ago)8 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price$6796 $122

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has 810% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads12836
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm22 nm
Die size192 mm2356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR42011-3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3, DDR42133 MHz Quad-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.03
+211%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 14.46

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 211% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+211%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 22359

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 211% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.03 14.46
Recency 18 September 2019 8 September 2014
Physical cores 64 18
Threads 128 36
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 145 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2696 V3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2696 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 1046 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Xeon E5-2696 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.