Celeron J1800 vs Xeon E5-2696 V3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.84
+3744%
Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36

Xeon E5-2696 V3 outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 3744% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5373051
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency9.033.41
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$72

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads362
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011-3FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 13.84
+3744%
Celeron J1800 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 21991
+3738%
Celeron J1800 573

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.84 0.36
Recency 8 September 2014 1 November 2013
Physical cores 18 2
Threads 36 2
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has a 3744.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has 1350% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2696 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2696 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1232 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.