Xeon w7-3555 vs E5-2695 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016, $2,424
18 cores / 36 threads, 120 Watt
10.68
Xeon w7-3555
2024, $2,339
28 cores / 56 threads, 325 Watt
38.36
+259%

Xeon w7-3555 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v4 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking81492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7217.44
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency3.785.01
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (9 years ago)24 August 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,424$2,339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w7-3555 has 2322% better value for money than Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data28
Threads3656
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB75 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size456.12 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt325 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40112

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 10.68
Xeon w7-3555 38.36
+259%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 18840
Samples: 62
Xeon w7-3555 67636
+259%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.68 38.36
Recency 20 June 2016 24 August 2024
Physical cores 18 28
Threads 36 56
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 325 Watt

Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 170.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has a 259.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 55.6% more physical cores and 55.6% more threads.

The Intel Xeon w7-3555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
Intel Xeon w7-3555
Xeon w7-3555

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 136 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Xeon w7-3555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.