Core i3-13100 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads
12.53
+31.9%
Core i3-13100
2023
4 cores / 8 threads
9.50

Xeon E5-2695 v4 outperforms Core i3-13100 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking553735
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation25.3245.27
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raptor Lake-S
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,424no data
Current price$179 (0.1x MSRP)$150

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-13100 has 79% better value for money than Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads368
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size456.12 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 730
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 12.53
+31.9%
i3-13100 9.50

Xeon E5-2695 v4 outperforms Core i3-13100 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2695 v4 19384
+31.9%
i3-13100 14692

Xeon E5-2695 v4 outperforms Core i3-13100 by 32% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2695 v4 960
i3-13100 2256
+135%

Core i3-13100 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v4 by 135% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2695 v4 7373
+0.3%
i3-13100 7348

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 12.53 9.50
Recency 20 June 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 18 4
Threads 36 8
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 60 Watt

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-13100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2695 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-13100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Core i3-13100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
Intel Core i3-13100
Core i3-13100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 85 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 310 votes

Rate Core i3-13100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v4 or Core i3-13100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.