Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2692 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 100 Watt
7.63
Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.01
+96.7%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon E5-2692 v2 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking969473
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency7.2240.56
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size160 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011FP7
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 7.63
Ryzen 7 7735HS 15.01
+96.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 12119
Ryzen 7 7735HS 23848
+96.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.63 15.01
Recency 1 September 2013 1 April 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7735HS, on the other hand, has a 96.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 266.7% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7735HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2692 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2692 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7735HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Ryzen 7 7735HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2
Xeon E5-2692 v2
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2692 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1524 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2692 v2 or Ryzen 7 7735HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.