Celeron N3000 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking957not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency7.22no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.04 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.08 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
Socket2011FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Series
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 12119
+1852%
Celeron N3000 621

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 1 April 2015
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 4 Watt

Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Celeron N3000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2692 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Celeron N3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2
Xeon E5-2692 v2
Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2692 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2692 v2 or Celeron N3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.