Xeon E5-4650L vs E5-2690

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
6.13
+14.2%
Xeon E5-4650L
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
5.37

Xeon E5-2690 outperforms Xeon E5-4650L by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10821165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.760.13
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.304.42
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$397$8,685

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2690 has 2792% better value for money than Xeon E5-4650L.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)20480 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB384 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 6.13
+14.2%
Xeon E5-4650L 5.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 9734
+14.1%
Xeon E5-4650L 8533

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.13 5.37
Recency 6 March 2012 14 May 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon E5-4650L, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 17.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4650L in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-4650L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690
Xeon E5-2690
Intel Xeon E5-4650L
Xeon E5-4650L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 610 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4650L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 or Xeon E5-4650L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.