Xeon E3-1240 v6 vs E5-2690

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
6.13
+12.5%
Xeon E3-1240 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.45

Xeon E5-2690 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v6 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10801152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.766.67
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E3
Power efficiency4.307.16
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$397$272

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v6 has 77% better value for money than Xeon E5-2690.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt72 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size384 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no dataN/A
Max resolution over eDPno dataN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPortno dataN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 6.13
+12.5%
Xeon E3-1240 v6 5.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 9734
+12.5%
Xeon E3-1240 v6 8656

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2690 584
Xeon E3-1240 v6 1397
+139%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2690 3447
Xeon E3-1240 v6 4395
+27.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.13 5.45
Recency 6 March 2012 28 March 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 72 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 has a 12.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon E3-1240 v6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v6 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E3-1240 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690
Xeon E5-2690
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6
Xeon E3-1240 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 610 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 or Xeon E3-1240 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.