i7-5700HQ vs Xeon E5-2690

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
6.13
+60.9%
Core i7-5700HQ
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.81

Xeon E5-2690 outperforms Core i7-5700HQ by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10801464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.760.42
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency4.307.67
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Broadwell-H (2015)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$397$378

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2690 has 795% better value for money than i7-5700HQ.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2182 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt47 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
VGAno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 6.13
+60.9%
i7-5700HQ 3.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 9734
+61%
i7-5700HQ 6047

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2690 584
i7-5700HQ 1120
+91.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2690 3447
+6.7%
i7-5700HQ 3230

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.13 3.81
Recency 6 March 2012 2 June 2015
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 47 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 has a 60.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i7-5700HQ, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 187.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-5700HQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2690 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-5700HQ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 and Core i7-5700HQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690
Xeon E5-2690
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
Core i7-5700HQ

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 610 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 43 votes

Rate Core i7-5700HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 or Core i7-5700HQ, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.