Atom Z3770 vs Xeon E5-2690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1060not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.83no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$397$37

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.39 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB4 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s17.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 9736
+1223%
Atom Z3770 736

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 27 September 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 8 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom Z3770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1587.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2690 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z3770 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690
Xeon E5-2690
Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 605 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 or Atom Z3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.