Xeon Gold 5318Y vs E5-2690 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads
12.48
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads
21.19
+69.8%

Gold 5318Y outperforms E5-2690 v4 by 70% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking543221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation11.9016.85
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,090no data
Current price$50 (0x MSRP)$2141

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5318Y has 42% better value for money than Xeon E5-2690 v4.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2848
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature89 °C87 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data87 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1.5 TB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 12.48
Xeon Gold 5318Y 21.19
+69.8%

Gold 5318Y outperforms E5-2690 v4 by 70% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2690 v4 19602
Xeon Gold 5318Y 33283
+69.8%

Gold 5318Y outperforms E5-2690 v4 by 70% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 12.48 21.19
Recency 20 June 2016 6 April 2021
Physical cores 14 24
Threads 28 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 165 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5318Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2690 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon Gold 5318Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1287 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v4 or Xeon Gold 5318Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.