EPYC 7252 vs Xeon E5-2690 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads
12.68
+1%
EPYC 7252
2019
8 cores / 16 threads
12.55

Xeon E5-2690 v4 outperforms EPYC 7252 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking543553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation11.9020.81
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,090$475
Current price$50 (0x MSRP)$335 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7252 has 75% better value for money than Xeon E5-2690 v4.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2816
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache35 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011TR4
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 12.68
+1%
EPYC 7252 12.55

Xeon E5-2690 v4 outperforms EPYC 7252 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2690 v4 19607
+1%
EPYC 7252 19411

Xeon E5-2690 v4 outperforms EPYC 7252 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 12.68 12.55
Recency 20 June 2016 7 August 2019
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 28 16
Cost $2090 $475
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 120 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and EPYC 7252, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
AMD EPYC 7252
EPYC 7252

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1299 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v4 or EPYC 7252, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.