FX-8300 vs Xeon E5-2689

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
6.41
+86.9%

Xeon E5-2689 outperforms FX-8300 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9931477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.391.45
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesXeonno data
Architecture codenameno dataVishera (2012−2015)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$80 $84

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8300 has 272% better value for money than Xeon E5-2689.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
L2 cacheno data8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2689 6.41
+86.9%
FX-8300 3.43

Xeon E5-2689 outperforms FX-8300 by 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2689 9922
+87%
FX-8300 5306

Xeon E5-2689 outperforms FX-8300 by 87% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.41 3.43
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 95 Watt

The Xeon E5-2689 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and FX-8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689
Xeon E5-2689
AMD FX-8300
FX-8300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2824 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2689 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2222 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2689 or FX-8300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.