i3-2348M vs Xeon E5-2689

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
6.48
+681%

Xeon E5-2689 outperforms Core i3-2348M by a whopping 681% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10652595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeonIntel Core i3
Power efficiency5.142.16
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)
Number of transistors2,270 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
Socket2011PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M.

PCIe version3.02
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2689 6.48
+681%
i3-2348M 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2689 9922
+679%
i3-2348M 1274

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.48 0.83
Recency 6 March 2012 1 January 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2689 has a 680.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i3-2348M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2689 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2348M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-2348M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and Core i3-2348M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689
Xeon E5-2689
Intel Core i3-2348M
Core i3-2348M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3021 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2689 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 74 votes

Rate Core i3-2348M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2689 or Core i3-2348M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.