Xeon D-1531 vs E5-2689 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
10.73
+124%
Xeon D-1531
2015
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
4.78

Xeon E5-2689 v4 outperforms Xeon D-1531 by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7211249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.782.69
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon D
Power efficiency6.1512.92
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,723$348

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-1531 has 51% better value for money than Xeon E5-2689 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 2.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier3122
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache25 MB1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature52 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors3200 Million3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011-3FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531.

PCIe version3.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes4024
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 10.73
+124%
Xeon D-1531 4.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 17049
+125%
Xeon D-1531 7592

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.73 4.78
Recency 20 June 2016 1 November 2015
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-2689 v4 has a 124.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

Xeon D-1531, on the other hand, has 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1531 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Xeon D-1531, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4
Xeon E5-2689 v4
Intel Xeon D-1531
Xeon D-1531

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 185 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2689 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon D-1531 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2689 v4 or Xeon D-1531, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.