Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
11.00
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
40.65
+270%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2689 v4 by a whopping 270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking65657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.3555.58
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raphael (Zen 4)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,723no data
Current price$100 (0x MSRP)$821

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X has 67% better value for money than Xeon E5-2689 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size246.24 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperature52 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors3200 Million13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011-3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 11.00
Ryzen 9 7950X 40.65
+270%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2689 v4 by 270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2689 v4 17017
Ryzen 9 7950X 62880
+270%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2689 v4 by 270% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2689 v4 1121
Ryzen 9 7950X 2940
+162%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2689 v4 by 162% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2689 v4 6812
Ryzen 9 7950X 19309
+183%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2689 v4 by 183% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.00 40.65
Recency 20 June 2016 27 September 2022
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 170 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2689 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4
Xeon E5-2689 v4
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 179 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2689 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1366 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2689 v4 or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.