i9-12900KF vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
11.99
Core i9-12900KF
2021
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
25.88
+116%

Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2682 v4 by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking637188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.86
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Core i9
Power efficiency9.4619.59
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 4.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2132
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache40 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size456.12 mm2215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1,536 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.805 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 11.99
i9-12900KF 25.88
+116%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 19051
i9-12900KF 41116
+116%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.99 25.88
Recency 20 June 2016 4 November 2021
Threads 32 24
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 33.3% more threads, and 4.2% lower power consumption.

i9-12900KF, on the other hand, has a 115.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Core i9-12900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2682 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2682 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-12900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i9-12900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Core i9-12900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 131 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 541 vote

Rate Core i9-12900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2682 v4 or Core i9-12900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.