Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads
12.14
+44.2%

Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Core i5-10400F by a considerable 44% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking574829
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.8048.39
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$155
Current price$248 $100 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-10400F has 188% better value for money than Xeon E5-2682 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache40 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size1,536 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 12.14
+44.2%
i5-10400F 8.42

Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Core i5-10400F by 44% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2682 v4 18781
+44.1%
i5-10400F 13029

Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Core i5-10400F by 44% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.14 8.42
Recency 20 June 2016 30 April 2020
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-10400F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2682 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-10400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12490 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2682 v4 or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.