Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	594	2040
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.31	no data
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Xeon E5	no data
Architecture codename	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$248	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	16 (Hexadeca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	32	2
Base clock speed	no data	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	2.4 GHz
Bus support	2 × 9.6 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	no data	80K (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB	1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache	40 MB	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Die size	456.12 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	7200 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	no data	1700
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
TSX	+	+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

+

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size	1,536 GB	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by 693% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	12.13	1.53
Recency	20 June 2016	4 January 2022
Physical cores	16	2
Threads	32	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---